fbpx Spectacular science: controversial? | Ecsite

Spectacular science: controversial?

Theatrical plays, magic shows, stand-up comedies, mystery games… are tools used to engage the public in science centres, but also in schools and research institutes. On the one hand, they represent an effective engagement tool, in particular for underserved audiences. On the other hand, they risk to reflect an old-fashioned view of communication, a way to “make the pill easier to swallow”, or to take attention away from the social implications of science.

Projects like TEMI and PERFORM are exploring spectacular science in a Responsible Research and Innovation perspective. They are developing an articulated methodology based on the use of mysteries and performing arts in different learning environments, such as science centres (PERFORM) and the classroom (TEMI).

Considerations from a science centre explainer, a scientist and a teacher will spark a discussion on the controversial use of spectacular science for public engagement. The issue is not new, but needs a continuous update to overcome stereotypes, avoid disconnecting science learning from the real world, and stimulate a dialogue between science centres and other relevant actors such as teachers and researchers.

Facilitator

Coordinator
Onl'fait
Geneva
Switzerland
photo Meriem Fresson
Coordination and international projects manager
TRACES ESPGG
Paris
France

Session speakers

Professor
University of Milan, Dept. of Physics
Aniello Mennella is an astronomy professor at the University of Milan who often uses poetry, theatre and music during public lectures about astronomy. He will share his own view about spectacular science and how it can (mis)shape the perception of science.
Head of Science and Art Events Lab
Warsaw
Poland
Blazej Dawidson is a science musem explainer and coordinates the team dedicated to science shows at the Centrum Nauki Kopernik. He will explain his experience and opinions about spectacular science in science centers and museums.